Monday, September 29, 2008

Fundamentals of a Healthy Church (part 2)


Pastor Ryan broke down the fundamentals of the local church as found in God's Word. He challenged the class to do the work of an evangelist. Do you know what that entails?

DOWNLOAD HERE --> Fundamentals of a Healthy Church (part2).mp3

During the second hour I fielded questions based on the message presented during the first hour. I also explained how it should look like when a person is trusting in God. Experience tells us that this is not always the case, but then again it's solely up to us whether or not we will trust Him. It's a volitional act that hinges upon information (Bible doctrine). The more we know, the easier it is to trust in God. The less we know, the harder it becomes to trust Him with anything.

DOWNLOAD --> Q&A on the Gospel.mp3

The Doctrine of the Gospel


The "Doctrine of the Gospel" has been a much heated discussion lately among those holding to a free-grace perspective with regards to soteriology. Ryan defined in context how the word "gospel" was used in relation to salvation, believers, and unbelievers. He concluded that the primary use of the word leans heavily on those who are believers in Jesus Christ. In other words, the gospel (good news) is primarily for believers! All of this was taught in ten minutes.

You can download the message onto your computer, ipod, mp3, etc...

DOWNLOAD --> Doctrine of the Gospel.mp3

Matthew 5:13-16

13 ¶ “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men. 14 ¶ "You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 "Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. 16 "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven. Matthew 5:13-16 NKJV

Last Thursday at our Bible class we covered the topic of "Consultation." Dr. Hendricks gave us some excellent resources to consult with when studying the Scriptures for ourselves. I brought along some personal reference material and passed it around so that everyone can see what I use when doing research.


We concluded our class by observing the passage which is found in Matthew chapter five. Listen to the entire class by downloading the teaching HERE:

Steadfast in the Word,

Freddy

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked...

Thursday nights are always stomping grounds as far as discussions are concerned. This is generally expected as we provide an environment conducive for growth while challenging each person to test their personal convictions and understanding on a given passage. Students usually grab a cup of coffee and wait for the appropriate time to pitch in and give their fifty cents.

51 ¶ Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, 52 and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; 53 and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many. 54 So when the centurion and those with him, who were guarding Jesus, saw the earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly, saying, "Truly this was the Son of God!" Matthew 27:51-54

The students know me for purposely giving them a hard time. I'll many times challenge them to "think outside of the box" in order to get them out of their comfort zone. I have always believed that a good teacher will do whatever he can to stimulate the class to "think." For me, the discussion does not necessarily have to be logical nor do people have to understand the concept or proposition initially. My goal is to encourage individuals to think things through so that they can learn how to use the scriptures for themselves. Rarely will I give a deductive type study where answers and details are provided along the way. Rather, I prefer that the students mine the gems for themselves (inductive approach) so that they can fully appreciate their discoveries together. Sometimes when Jesus would speak it wouldn't make sense at all. There was even a time when the disciples said that it was too difficult to understand what Jesus was teaching (John 6:60). Difficulty often precedes learning as clearly seen in the lives of the disciples.

I asked the class to see if they could ascertain the significance of the veil being torn from top to bottom. There were a mixture of answers and several insisted that we leave it alone since it's not clearly stated as to why it the veil tore. Of course, I had my own thoughts.

I'd like to cite some views held by scholars who we may or may not agree with. My reason for doing this is to show that there have been others who have attempted to make sense of this portion of scripture. I believe that there is significance which can be deduced when comparing scripture with scripture. In seminary this is sometimes called "systematizing." Sometimes the obvious is not clearly stated. Only through a careful comparison with other books of the Bible can one arrive at a conclusion. Though the significance may not be explicit regarding the torn veil, through the systematizing of verses we can get its implicit meaning from combined passages. We know for example the following truths gleaned from the Old Testament:

*Behind the veil was the presence of God
*Access to God was limited to the priest
*Confession of a nation or a people were done through the agency of a priest

Questions that will help us stay in keeping with the overall context and thrust of God's Word:

1. Is God behind a veil today? Why or why not?
2. Is access to God limited today? Why or why not?
3. Do we need a priest in order to confess sins to God? Why or why not?

When thinking biblically, one should strive to ascertain the meaning whether or not the meaning is clearly stated in the text. This requires work. This is where the break-down usually occurs with other ministries. Most of the time it's the text itself which is distorted away from it's true meaning. I realize that some at this juncture may feel a little uneasy, but our safeguard is in making sure that whatever we conclude will flow consistently with the rest of scripture.

We seem to be comfortable with the following doctrines/concepts even though the words themselves do not appear in scripture nor are they ever defined apart from a systematized approach (as I have done to arrive at my conclusion regarding an alternative way of understanding the significance of the torn veil)to making sense of the word or doctrine itself. Consider the following:

*Trinity (considered a key doctrine among evangelicals)
*Atheism
*Divinity
*Incarnation
*Monotheism
*Rapture
*Omniscience
*Omnipresence
*Omnipotent

Interestingly enough, none of these words ever appear in the Bible and neither are they defined. And yet we have volumes upon volumes of books shedding light on these subjects.

Something does not have to be clearly formulated in the Bible to be considered valid. Not all things in the Bible are perfectly clear. Consider the book of Revelation. It contains many things that are cryptic that must be interpreted after examining all of God's Word.

During class, I mentioned how we should be able to determine the significance of the veil being torn based on what we know. I mentioned how even if we stayed in the book of Matthew alone as the primary text we have enough info(as clearly seen and shared among the group)to be able to conclude what the significance was. Of course, if we did not have a basic understanding of the veil and it's significance or meaning, we would have to seek additional information in order for us to come up with any conclusion. I tend to believe that there are several meanings we can conclude with. That night I highlighted the fact that God is no longer behind the veil based on what I know to be true.

Here are the other views:

The tearing of the veil signified that the way into God's presence was now open to all through a new and living way (Heb. 10:19-22). The fact that it tore "from top to bottom" showed that no man had split the veil, God did it. John Macarthur Study Bible

This symbolizes the permanent opening of God's presence to us, giving us direct access to God through the atoning death of Christ (Heb. 10:19-20). Tim LaHaye Prophecy Study Bible

The fact that this occurred from top to bottom signified that God is the One who ripped the thick curtain. It was not torn from the bottom by men ripping it. God was showing that the way of access into His presence was now available for everyone, not simply the Old Testament high priest (Heb. 4:14-16; 10:19-22). The Bible Knowledge Commentary

By splitting the veil "from top to bottom" God the Father dramatically showed His complete satisfaction with the Son's work on the cross. This showed that believers may now "enter the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which He consecrated for us, through the veil, that is, His flesh" (Heb. 10:19-20). Salvation by Dr. Earl Radmacher


The tearing of the veil from top to bottom followed soon after Jesus Christ completed the work on the cross. This points to the very fact that God no longer dwells within the confines of a tabernacle made from hands, but rather inside each and every believer who has believed in Jesus Christ for salvation.(Heb. 4:14-16; 10:19-22). A.I. Cortez, Jr.

You can get the audio teaching of last week's Bible class by clicking here:

http://tinyurl.com/5xmjmd

Freddy Cortez

Sunday, September 21, 2008

The Doctrine of the Church

The Doctrine of the Church explained in 10 minutes

Sunday, September 14, 2008

The Doctrine of Discipleship

The Doctrine of Discipleship explained in 10 minutes.

Matthew 18:10

"Take heed that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven. Matthew 18:10

Last Thursday night during our Bible class, we went over Matthew 18: 1-5 passage one last time. I asked the class to see if they could come up with any comments from outside sources as to what this passages was teaching. After several minutes of interacting we concluded once again with the following:

1. The disciples wanted to know who was going to be the greatest (best) in the kingdom of heaven (this is a reference to the 1000 year Millennial kingdom). This was not a reference to the kingdom of God or how to get into heaven as some would understand it. This is a different kingdom altogether which would arrive on earth during the return of Christ (2nd Coming). The greatest disciple will mirror the child's humility. It was an attitude of humility rather than arrogance that would promote one to greatness. The life of Christ demonstrated this very fact.

2. If the disciples would humble themselves (v.4) like the little child they would be the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

3. In (v.5) I pointed out that whoever receives one little child (believer that has humbled himself like a child) in My name receives Me. In other words, when a believer receives another believer who has humbled himself, then he receives/welcomes Christ. This should encourage us to extend grace to our brother or sister in Christ, especially if they (according to this verse) humble themselves. I can see how this will help strengthen relationships within the church during disagreements. James chapter four has a lot to say about this.

After examining this passage, we continued with the next several verses. We ended on a verse that is often cited to show that children have guardian angels watching over them. I'm referring to verse 10, of course.

When you follow the flow of the passage, you'll notice that Jesus is still referring to the humble believer! I'm sure kids have a special place in God's heart but we are not told that children have guardian angels watching over them. What the text says is that the angels are observing (watching) the face of God not watching over kids.

What's the point? Well, we are warned not to despise or look down on a believer who has demonstrated humility.

Freddy Cortez

For the full audio recording of this class right click and save HERE:

Note: picture taken from youarelovedchildcare.com